Nikki Haley is a Trojan Horse.

If you’re a Democratic mega-donor, facing the impending likelihood of your candidate, Joe Biden, losing the election as indicated by polls, it’s a challenging moment. The issue is compounded by the presence of Kamala Harris as Biden’s running mate, making her immune to criticism or demotion due to her Jamaican heritage, creating a dilemma for donors. Harris is perceived as even more unpopular than Biden. To navigate this situation intelligently, there’s a suggestion to consider supporting a Republican candidate who aligns with Democratic priorities. Nikki Haley is put forward as an example – a liberal figure embracing the four tenets of neoliberalism: white guilt, a finance-based economy, mass immigration, and endless neoconservative wars. The argument is made that Haley shares identical priorities with Biden and presents an alternative strategy for donors looking to influence political outcomes.

In analyzing the current GOP primary and the dynamics of the 2024 presidential race, it becomes evident that the anticipated showdown between Trump and Biden is not unfolding as expected. The intricacies extend beyond the trials and prosecutions involving Trump, revealing similar dynamics on the Biden side. Contrary to initial perceptions, the primary puppet being manipulated by nonpartisan forces isn’t Gavin Newsome or Michelle Obama. Instead, the true puppet masters have found a more convenient frontman within the Republican Party – Nikki Haley.

These puppeteers, concerned with maintaining the foreign war machine and administrative state control, are strategically backing Nikki Haley. This choice allows them to appear nonpartisan and bipartisan, distancing themselves from allegations of bias against Trump. The managerial class, operating fundamentally as nonpartisan actors, sees Nikki Haley as an effective Trojan Horse to serve their objectives. The overarching plan is clear: narrow the presidential race to a two-horse competition between Trump and Haley, eliminating Trump from contention and facilitating Haley’s ascent. This strategy aims to sustain the war machine, preserve the censorship industrial complex, and maintain administrative state dominance. 

The media’s fervent promotion of Haley, despite lukewarm support among Republican voters, raises questions about the authenticity of her rise, suggesting potential manipulation in both polling and media coverage. The observation is made from Iowa, where Haley’s support appears limited, adding anotherlayer of complexity to the unfolding political landscape.